Quantcast

Betty's Blog

Timely Teacher Talk

Sponsored Links

My Lesson Plans

    Crowd control

    Five students didn't receive their diplomas because of cheers from the crowd as they walked across the stage in Galesburg, Illinois.  Rules are rules, I guess, but this seems a bit excessive to me. 

    About a month before the May 27 ceremony, Galesburg High students and their parents had to sign a contract promising to act in dignified way. Violators were warned they could be denied their diplomas and barred from the after-graduation party.

    In Galesburg, the issue has taken on added controversy with accusations that the students were targeted because of their race: four are black and one is Hispanic. Parents say cheers also erupted for white students, and none of them was denied a diploma.

    Principal Tom Chiles said administrators who monitored the more than 2,000-seat auditorium reported only disruptions they considered "significant," and all turned in the same five names.

    Race had absolutely nothing to do with it whatsoever," Chiles said. "It is the amount of disruption at the time of the incident."

    School officials said they will hear students and parents out if they appeal. Meanwhile, the school said the five students can still get their diplomas by completing eight hours of public service work, answering phones, sorting books or doing other chores for the district, situated about 150 miles southwest of Chicago.

    This seems like an impossible situation to me.  How do you control others?  Did Grandpa Ted or Aunt Susie have to sign a contract too? 

    Maybe spectators could be placed in one of those sound proof rooms like they have in some churches so you don't hear crying babies.  Virtual graduations might take over where everyone is calmly sitting around watching a computer screen and no one can hear other people yell.  Maybe there could be two ceremonies.  Those parents wanting a solemn occasion could sign up for the serious one, and the families wanting to let out with hoops and hollers could sign up for the relaxed occasion.  Perhaps the names of the graduating students could also appear on a large screen to make it more acceptable if the family doesn't hear their graduate's name due to excessive noise from the crowd.  This sounds like a good problem solving activity that surely could lead to something other than depriving five students of their diplomas.                                                                                                                                                                                

                                                       It's not easy to be quiet!

    Posted: Sunday, June 03, 2007 11:39 AM by Betty

    Comments

    texprofes said:

    I don’t know for sure how to feel about this one, I wasn’t there and do not know the history of the incident. I can certainly understand the use of “iron fisted” measures if the crowed historically causes so much commotion as to invoke riots and such, but with the way the article is written, it sounds more like the school board acted this way without reason.

    What do I assume?  Taking what I know and have experienced in contemporary media is that a reporter and news agency is trying to exploit the issue. They want to ruffle feathers, get people stirred up, and make all those involved seem like innocent victims of an excessive government. It may be another case of a news agency “making” the news instead of “reporting” it.  

    Our district allows the audience to applaud the graduating seniors. We think it is great that they receive the support, and that they value their accomplishment. Every one accepts the practice and they’re pretty considerate of others and refrain from causing a ruckus.

    # June 4, 2007 12:16 AM

    Mystery Teacher said:

    I am sorry but I think that was just plain wrong.  When I graduated from college in 1986, I was a single parent raising 2 girls.  My girls saw the struggle and studying that went into this graduation.  They were 10 and 5 and when my name was called they stood up in the crowd and cheered for me.  All by themselves!  It was awesome.  I was crying for them.  How can high school be any different for some of these kids.  Parents are happy and proud and often surprised that their kids made it through.  I say let them cheer.

    # June 4, 2007 2:19 PM

    Pigs said:

    So, wait....the kid got punished because his relatives or friends can't control themselves? How is that fair? Why didn't they just escort the offending people out?

    # June 4, 2007 2:39 PM

    red pencil said:

    What if a group of people decided to cheer loudly for someone they didn't really like or know just so the graduate's diploma would be denied!  We must admit that there are some "not so nice" people out there.

    # June 4, 2007 9:17 PM

    Marti said:

    Again, this is absurd.  Those kids deserve an apology!

    Why are they held responsible for their parents' behavior?  

    The venue needs to enforce the security and, if people are so loud and rude, remove them - just as you would at a concert or any other event.  

    # June 7, 2007 3:05 PM
    New Comments to this post are disabled.