About ten years ago, I listened to a wise math consultant explain that teachers were covering too much material too fast, and that the kids just weren't given enough time to soak up the knowledge. This lady really knew her stuff and advised our district to focus on four math concepts per year at the elementary level. We all thought that she made perfect sense and were ready to implement her plan.
Of course, nothing changed. We continued to run the math marathon of teaching. State testing required that we cover one objective after another at record speed. I don't remember the math consultant's name, but she must be amused by the recent findings of a presidential panel.
Schools could improve students' sluggish math scores by hammering home the basics, such as addition and multiplication, and increasing the focus on fractions and some geometry, a presidential panel recommended Thursday.
"Difficulty with fractions (including decimals and percents) is pervasive and is a major obstacle to further progress in mathematics, including algebra," the panel, appointed by President Bush two years ago and led by former University of Texas President Larry Faulkner, said in a report.
The report also says other critical topics — such as whole numbers and aspects of geometry and measurement — should be studied in a more in-depth way.
I have never liked the "duh" response some people give when hearing something that is obvious, but it sure seems appropriate for this report. Does it take a panel to come up with this information? With all of the pressure on testing, I have to wonder if anything will change. Could teachers actually be allowed to slow down and use teachable moments for in-depth learning? (By the way, I found out from Bud the Teacher that this is Pi Day. Check it out on his post!)