In our country, we have to be twenty-one to consume alcoholic beverages and eighteen to do pretty much everything else.  The rationale is that there are some things children should be able to do and some things children should not be allowed to do.  It makes a lot of sense to me.  I honestly don't believe a sixteen year old should drive.  I am a little skeptical of a fifteen year old's ability to mother.  It just seems that there are some things that require life experience.

I mention this because I've noticed that schools seem to be tracking students earlier and earlier to determine future career paths.  For example, at our school, the local district explained to students that they had to choose a school (one magnet for business, another for technology, another for future university students, another as a cosmotology school) and a program within each school.  Thus, they explained to fourteen year olds that they had to start thinking about what they wanted to do with their lives. 

"I know you're young," a counselor explained, "but if you go into this journalism program, you can get college credit and earn a degree by the time you turn twenty."  Thus, a child could enter the work force before he could legally enjoy an ice cold Hefeweizen. 

When I was fourteen, I wanted to be a baseball announcer and an engineer and a movie director.  It changed from week to week.  Yet, I had four years of high school to get to know my own identity and another two years of college to think through hard questions about life before I ever chose a major.  It seems to me that fourteen might be a little young to decide upon a future career. 

Why do we tell a child that he must be sixteen to drive, eighteen to fight for his country and twenty one to drink, but we ask him, at fourteen, to choose his life direction?