Quantcast

In the Valley

Reflections from a young teacher in the San Fernando Valley

News

  • March 6-8 - Ms. Mac will be attending Project Citizen training. March 14 - Seven of Ms. Mac's students will be competing in Los Angeles History Day! March 29 - The Cesar Chavez students will be participating in the San Fernando Cesar Chavez Commemorative March

Sponsored Links

My Favorite Posts

    Candidate notion of NCLB is sooo 2005

    “I've had a lot of discussions with teachers all throughout Iowa. And they feel betrayed and frustrated by No Child Left Behind,” said Senator Barrack Obama at the Democratic (pre-)Presidential Debate in Iowa this past Sunday.

    Like many teachers, I took notice of this comment, sitting up slightly on my couch and leaning toward the television, eager to hear more.

    “[Teachers] can't be judged simply on standardized tests that don't take into account whether children are prepared before they get to school or not,” he said.

    “YES!” I thought. “And, at the same time……..No.”

    I know that many teachers have felt betrayed and frustrated by NCLB and refer to the legislation with scathing language. I believe that Senator Obama was sincere in his attempts to be thoughtful and responsive to the anger that teachers have experienced.

    Obama’s comments, however, reflect the attitude that educators held several years ago, when educators and administrators were furious at the legislation for its heavy performance demands and severe financial consequences that rendered schools ineffective. The angry maxims of ‘Teaching to the Test’ were teachers’ expressions of powerlessness.

    What is true now, however, is a new understanding in education—one that is rooted in the mandated education standards, and is achieved by putting authority back in the hands of teachers.

    The process is called ‘Strategic Design’ by some, ‘Backwards Design’ by others, or more simply ‘Standards Based Instruction.’ I know, from first hand experience, the process is being taught at the University of Michigan and implemented with astounding success in high-needs charter schools in Los Angeles.

    The general concept—Students need to learn the material that is mandated in state standards, and they deserve to learn it to proficiency. They must know it up and down, constructed and deconstructed. They must know why its true, how we know its true, and where it is relevant to their everyday lives. If students can grasp the concepts at this higher level of thinking, then they have all the knowledge necessary to excel on a standardized test that examines that material.

    To anyone who is impassioned about educating America’s youth, this notion seems like a “Duh.” But the reality is that students are not being taught this way in many American schools. Students are memorizing, not synthesizing. Textbooks, not standards, are dictating what material will be taught. Furthermore, teachers are grasping at scattered techniques, strategies and activities that do not do justice to their own skills to know and to teach their students.

    It is no wonder that NCLB caused teachers to feel betrayed; the legislation was an attempt to bully struggling teachers into success, rather than supporting them and trusting them to find their way. Now, however, teachers are beginning to move past the anger and the betrayal. They are responding to the problems in education and they are creating real solutions.

    The new message in Education is this: Teachers have found focus and faith in their mission to teach; No child will be left behind.

    Posted: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:51 PM by MsMac
    Comments

    Joel Heffner said:

    >>The new message in Education is this: Teachers have found focus and faith in their mission to teach; No child will be left behind.<<

    Really? Teachers I speak to have completely lost faith over the past 10 years. They have no idea what their "mission" is anymore. Children will probably be left further behind as long as politicians set the goals of education. In NYC, for example, the mayor and chancellor set policy and have completely blocked out the teachers and principals in policy making. Incidentally, the chancellor's claim to fame was that he was a member of the Clinton justice department. We have a long way to go...unfortunately.

    REPLY>>Wow, how frustrating for you, that your experiences in education are like that. 

    I think you may have seen in my blog where I acknowledge that some teachers have that experience, but in large I believe the dialogue is moving in a new direction.

    I hope you find the opportunity to sit in on some of the new conversations in education, in schools, at trainings, or at the academic level.  In my experience, the dialogues have been incredibly positive and empowering. 

    Best of luck!

    # October 11, 2007 7:37 AM

    John Spencer said:

    Here is my frustration with backward design.  Research also supports a more constructivist approach.  Backward design does not seem to differentiate between skills and concept development.  There are times when all students need to be on the same page (such as learning how to write a paragraph) and it's important that we see them to proficiency.  Yet, on another, more conceptual level, no two students should be learning the exact same thing, because no two people are alike.  The nature of synthesis is that students will take concepts from multiple sources and create something better.  

    Also, when there are so many standards to cover, students do not always reach that necessary synthesis.  What I would like to see is a backwards design that embraces larger, broader standards - fewer standards that are studied more in-depth.  Here in AZ, we have a huge list of standards and students end up with a shallow memorization of ideas rather than constructing the necessary concepts.  

    # October 11, 2007 9:01 AM

    MysteryTeacher said:

    According to a famous doctor of education, Arizona has more standards at each grade level than a teacher can teach in 10 years.  He was appalled.  Me too.  But, we are required to do it.  How can children NOT be left behind when everything is mapped and scripted down to the letter?  When you have 31 kids in your class, how can you get to the little ones who are lost when the ones who aren't are disruptive and rude because they are bored?  Children will be left behind.  Nothing is going to change that.  NOTHING!  Even if we had a mastery of the standards based grading instead of percents.  Kids are going to be left behind because they refuse to do their work, have their parents write excuses why they didn't do homework (as if I would forgive it anyway), are absent because they are baby-sitting for siblings at home, they had to go shopping (my personal favorite) and in general have parents who do NOT support education.

    Until we get the public SUPPORT we need, instead of criticism, we will always leave some children behind.

    Especially when you are dealing with unlabeled ED kids in the regular classrooms.

    # October 13, 2007 6:02 PM
    New Comments to this post are disabled.